Cultural Streams International


This article was submitted by the author to, and published here by, Cultural Streams International.




A PERSONAL COMMENT ON CULTURE

A Personal Comment On Culture

 

By Robert Lunaburg

 

My long life (I'm in my seventh decade) has brought wonder and knowledge to me constantly. I even claim the acquisition of a small portion of wisdom along the way. One of the marvels that I find fascinating is that of how our culture is passed down generation after generation. I am a lifelong member of one national, and several local cultures, which are firmly woven into the fabric of the United States of America's boundaries, so I am both biased and myopic.

 

Transmitting Culture

One of the many questions I have always found interesting is, “How does culture get passed down through time and generations?”

 

It’s certain to me that people have to show and tell those, always younger than themselves, about the culture that directs the common thoughts and actions expressed by a community, or the culture simply does not continue.

 

If what I say seems to meander a bit, bear with me. I will sum it up in the end. 

 

If we go back far enough in time we find that culture, way back at its start, was passed on entirely by word of mouth, with some imagery, and some actions. Since I believe the root of understanding imagery and actions is based largely on language, I would say word of mouth had the most profound influence on the continued existence of all early cultures, although mimicked actions certainly worked before that.

 

Having said this, I have also participated in the party game called ‘Telephone’ where one person whispers a phrase to another, and that person in turn repeats it to another, and so on until the last person repeats what they hear out loud. The beginning statement rarely matches the ending statement. This game in itself isn’t a cultural influence, but it does point out how easily the spoken word can become corrupted over time.

 

Of course imagery and actions, once made permanent (e.g. symbols and dance), present a more constant and consistent basis for the words used to express the culture; they give concrete boundaries to the fluidity of language. So if a culture valued memorization of words, concrete forms would help pass culture forward less encumbered by change.

 

Change and Complexities

Now, if all this had occurred in isolated places, within a never changing environment, all cultures would have been free to be passed down, year after year, without change. This, of course, did not, and does not happen. So, the culture we value, live by, and strive to protect is something that is always ever changing. But as we live our culture, we tend to believe it has been that way for ever before, and will stay the way it is now forever into the future.

 

Another factor of culture is that it is complicated—so much so that throughout time we began to charge some among us to be keepers of our culture. In some places these keepers are community elders. In others, they are a specific segment of the people like medicine men, respected leaders, holders of the faith, and so on.

 

This raises yet another question, “When a culture is complicated, how many of those influenced by it are completely aware of it all?” My guess is, not everyone.

 

The Effects of Writing and Literacy

In time the written word came to be a dominant influence on preserving culture. In the beginning this was only for the few who were literate, those with the most influence on the lives of the many. But this would change as literacy grew among people.

 

It wasn’t that long ago that literacy for the masses became possible. I’m not thinking printing press here as much as I am just the ability to read and write.

 

Writing came before reading. That’s an interesting thought too.

 

In my few years, when compared to the history of the world since its beginning, I have witnessed a myriad of changes just to the instruments used for writing. I began with a lead pencil; moved from there to a simple pen point and inkwell. Then I experienced the mechanical pencil and fountain pen, next the ball point pen, and then for me it was the typewriter. Now, I use a computer. All these things dedicated to one task, that of writing, of preserving knowledge—one wonders if any of these color what is written.

 

Here's a small example of what I mean by this. I like to write stories. When I used a pencil, I used to imagine that all the words and stories were somehow contained in the pencil. I merely freed them to be expressed as I used it. I have no such thoughts like this about the computer. Does that change what I write? I wonder.

 

And so what influence might this have had on culture … books … the huge volumes of words used to influence the way we live? Under the weight of all that makes them up, we now attempt to hold fast to our culture.

 

What Is This Culture? Trying to Pin It Down

From where I stand, it is very hard for me to believe that my view of my national culture is shared universally by all who live in my nation. There are so few common symbols, and universally valued common rituals around today that I’m not even sure my view, my understanding of community culture, is shared by most who live in my community.

 

And so, what has happened to culture over time? It seems to me that without jointly held values, symbols, rituals, and words to explain them, culture is as vague as steam. It is comprised of catch phrases, homemade symbols, and pamphlets grounded in loud voices.

 

Culture, today, is not based on what is best for everyone today like when it was used to unite people within a safe and understood way of life. Everyone's sense of culture today is easily influenced by segments of other people who are in desperate need of the cultural understanding of what they sense existed within their communities in the past.

 

Which do we strive to preserve? Our perception of culture past, or that of today? Or is it right to say we believe our sense of today's culture has always been that way? I don't believe many ask these questions—just as no one contemplates a hammer. They just use it as if it always was as it is.

 

There is another sense I feel about culture. Even though we don't, and probably can't, articulate our own culture well enough to express it for others to understand and accept it as we do, we believe it to be sacred; something unquestionably worthy of defending, and preserving.

 

The Most Important Question: How Our Many Cultures Can Best Live Together

So then, and this is perhaps the most important question, one that brings us to the point of all this, “How do we live together in this enormous variety of personally held ideals and values that cultures (plural) present today?” I believe a world wide, commonly held universal culture is never going to happen. “So, what do we do?”

 

The answer is simple to express, but hard to do. It begins by all of us getting to know one another through literacy, and open dialogue. It goes on to include a willingness to find the harmony, and the good in each other—not the easily found bad we see in our differences. It begins when we want to get along with each other. Once this is a single universally held value (is that possible?), we will grow to value all of who we are—our differences and similarities, and culture will be valued for what it is: the binding force which unites, protects, and gives comfort to our lives in the places where we, each of us, exist.

 

© 2007 RJLHRD, Marrietta, GA ... Readers of this article may copy it without the copyright owner's permission, if the author and publisher are acknowledged in the copy and copy is used for educational, not-for-profit purposes.

***** If you would like to comment on this article, click here COMMENT. *****

Please include reference to this article in your comment